Tradition holds that the two previous temples of Solomon and Herod were
situated over the Dome of the Rock. There have also been theories that the
temple was just to the North or just to the South of the Dome of the Rock
on the Temple Mount. Recently, with what seems to go back to the writings
of Ernest L. Martin in 1994, there has been a lot of theories and beliefs
that the temple may not have been on the Temple Mount, but rather to the
South of the Temple Mount in the City of David. This page will look at the
arguments for both sides with references for further personal reasearch.
This page is focused more on the spacial aspect of the temple. For the history
of the temple, go
here.
I still have to do some more research on this but it presents, at the
very least, some compelling thoughts. I also recognize I’m no authority
on archaeology or history and so this page is a working collection of points
from experts on both sides and is a work in progress....
What Do We Know?
The first place to start is simply to examine quotes from Biblical and
historical first hand accounts. From the Bible we don't get much of a description
of the details of the location, but we do know some facts about its location.
From the Bible
In/On Mount Moriah (2 Chronicles 3:1 | 2 Chronicles 33:15)
In the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan
the Jebusite (2 Chronicles 3:1)
Yeshua travels at the triumphal entry from Bethphage and Bethany
to the mount of Olives, entered into Jerusalem and into the temple.
(Mark 11:1; 11-12)
Mount of Olives opposite of the Temple (Mark 13:3)
Solomon's house and the house of the LORD were encompassed by the
walls of Jerusalem (1 Kings 3:1)
Solomon's temple was 60 x 30 x 20 cubits (Length x Height x Breadth)
(1 Kings 6:2)
Solomon's porch was 20 x 10 cubits (Length [breadth of the temple]
x Breadth) (1 Kings 6:3)
King Jehoash is brought down from the house of the LORD by the way
of the gate of the guard to the king’s house (2 Kings 11:19)
The people sacrificed and burned incense still in the high places.
Jotham the son of Uzziah built the higher gate of the house of the LORD.
(2 Kings 15:35 | 2 Chronicles 27:3-4 | 1 Kings 3:2-4) This would seem
to indicate there was a higher place than the temple that people were
sacrificing at and so a gate was built at the temple leading to that
higher place.
The high gate of Benjamin was by the house of the LORD. (Jeremiah
20:2)
From scripture we can gather that the temple was opposite the Mount of
Olives on Mount Moriah where the threshingfloor was within the walls of
Jerusalem at the time of Solomon.
As described in 1 Kings 3:2-4, prior to the temple being built, “the
people sacrificed in high places, because there was no house built unto
the name of the LORD.” Then both 2 Kings 15:35 and 2 Chronicles
27:3-4 speak of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, building a higher gate of
the house of the LORD because the people were still sacrificing and burning
incense in the high places. This would seem to imply that the temple, which
was on Mount Moriah, had points higher to it upon which people were sacrificing
such that a gate was built on to that higher side.
The temple built after Babylon was 60 cubits shorter than Solomon's
temple. (Cyrus and Darius determined the measurements of the temple
construction, which is why they didn't follow the original design.)
Verse 3
Herod took away the old foundations and laid new ones, erecting
the temple on them. These foundations sank 20 cubits. (They resolved
to raise them again in the days of Nero)
The stones of the temple were 25 x 8 x 12 cubits (Length x Height
x Breadth)
The middle of the temple was visible to those that dwelt in
the country for a great many furlongs.
The entire temple was encompassed with very large cloisters
(Covered, open air walk typically running along walls of buildings.)
There was a large wall to both the cloisters
The hill was a rocky ascent, that declined by degrees towards
the east parts of the city, till it came to an elevated level. (Solomon
encompassed with a wall upwards and round the top of it.)
He also built a wall below, beginning at the bottom, which was
encompassed by a deep valley; and at the south side he laid rocks
together, and bound them one to another with lead, and included
some of the inner parts, till it proceeded to a great height, and
till both the largeness of the square edifice and its altitude were
immense, and till the vastness of the stones in the front were plainly
visible on the outside, yet so that the inward parts were fastened
together with iron, and preserved the joints immovable for all future
times.
When this work [for the foundation] was done in this manner,
and joined together as part of the hill itself to the very top of
it, he wrought it all into one outward surface, and filled up the
hollow places which were about the wall, and made it a level on
the external upper surface, and a smooth level also.
This hill was walled all round, and in compass four furlongs,
[the distance of] each angle containing in length a furlong: but
within this wall, and on the very top of all, there ran another
wall of stone also, having, on the east quarter, a double cloister,
of the same length with the wall; in the midst of which was the
temple itself.
This cloister looked to the gates of the temple
Verse 4
On the north side [of the temple] was built a citadel, whose
walls were square, and strong, and of extraordinary firmness.
This citadel was built by the kings of the Asamonean race, who
were also high priests before Herod, and they called it the Tower,
in which were reposited the vestments of the high priest. (They
were kept there and after he died they were under the control of
the Romans)
Herod fortified the tower, in order to secure and guard the
temple. To honor his friend and Roman ruler Antonius, he named it
the Tower of Antonia.
Verse 5
In the western quarters of the enclosure of the temple there
were four gates:
The first led to the king's palace and went to a passage
over the intermediate valley
Two led to the suburbs of the city
the last led to the other city, where the road descended
down into the valley by a great number of steps, and thence
up again by the ascent for the city lay over against the temple
in the manner of a theater, and was encompassed with a deep
valley along the entire south quarter.
To the South, the fourth front of the temple had gates in the
middle and also had the royal cloisters, with three walkways that
stretched from the East valley to the West valley. (Looking down
from the battlements/cloister was very high from the valley below)
This cloister had 162 pillars that stood in four rows with the
fourth row interwoven into the wall. Each pillar was the diameter
of three men joining hands around it. They were twenty-seven feet
long (tall), with a double spiral at their base. These four rows
of pillars created three walkways in the middle of this cloister,
two the same size with a breadth of thirty feet, the length was
a furlong, and the height fifty feet. The breadth of the middle
walkway of the cloister was one and a half times those on either
side, and the height was double. The roofs were adorned with deep
sculptures in wood, representing many sorts of figures. The middle
was much higher than the rest, and the wall of the front was adorned
with beams, resting upon pillars, that were interwoven into it,
and that front was all of polished stone.
In the midst of this cloister was the second, to be gone up
to by a few steps: this was encompassed by a stone wall for a partition,
with an inscription, which forbade any foreigner to go in under
pain of death. Now this inner enclosure had on its southern
and northern quarters three gates [equally] distant one from another;
but on the east quarter, towards the sun-rising, there was one large
gate, through which such as were pure came in, together with their
wives; but the temple further inward in that gate was not allowed
to the women; but still more inward was there a third [court of
the] temple, whereinto it was not lawful for any but the priests
alone to enter. The temple itself was within this; and before that
temple was the altar, upon which we offer our sacrifices and burnt-offerings
to God. Into none of these three did king Herod enter, for he was
forbidden, because he was not a priest. However, he took care of
the cloisters and the outer enclosures, and these he built in eight
years.
Verse 6
The temple was built by the priests in a year and six months.
The celebration of its rebuilding coincided with the king's inauguration
and so the celebration was great.
Verse 7
There was a passage built for the king that led from Antonia
to the inner temple, at its eastern gate. Over this he also erected
a tower for himself so he could get into the temple to guard against
any sedition made by the people against their kings.
There are five views as generally represented in the image below. You
can click on the various temples to jump to that section.
(This depiction is not precise, it's meant to be a
general view)
The Temple Mount
Modern DestructionBy Richard Benkin, Ph.D.
(May 2003) - In 1886, British explorer
Captain Charles Wilson undertook the most comprehensive survey of Jerusalem
in modern times, noting, “No one has ever questioned that the
[Jewish] Temple formerly stood within the Haram-es-Sherif [Moslem name
for the Temple Mount].”1 It would be difficult to think
of a more absurd notion. To deny that reality denies the essence of
both Jewish and Christian scripture. They both contain voluminous reference
to the temples, from their construction to the events in the life of
Jesus. In fact, Moslem and Arab history also confirms Warren’s
declaration. Before 638 CE—a rather late date in the history of that
region—there was no Islamic presence in Jerusalem. Its conqueror, the
Umayyad Caliph, Umar, asked its Byzantine Patriarch, Sophronius, to
show him the site of the Jewish Temples almost immediately upon entering
the city. Sophronius did so and said, “Here is that appalling
abomination.” Umar was indeed appalled—but not by the Temple itself.
He was incensed at the accumulated garbage and debris, which he believed
desecrated that Jewish holy site. He ordered the site cleansed
immediately in a manner befitting its holy purpose. Soon thereafter,
he commissioned The Dome of the Rock on the Mount, and his son had Al-Aqsa
mosque built there as well. These edifices were not constructed to mark
a Moslem holy site but to advertise Moslem hegemony over Jerusalem with
its Jewish and Christian holy sites. more...
There are four beliefs of the placement of the temple on the Temple Mount
area. The traditional location places the temple where the Dome of the Rock
currently sits. There are also conjectures for a location to the North and
to the South of the Dome of the Rock.
Traditional Location
The traditional location places the Holy of Holies on the rock over which
the Dome of the Rock was built. It is believed to be the site where Abraham
offered Isaac and the threshingfloor David purchased and built a temple
to the Lord on.
Certain historical accounts say that this building was built by the
Moslems to overlay the location of the original Jewish Temple(s) and
most rabbis in Israel today associate the original Temple location with
this site. Dr. Leen Ritmeyer has researched and written on the original
500 cubit square boundaries of the original Temple Mount site based
on this assumption. Recent journal articles still support this view.
(1) Former Jerusalem District archaeologist Dr. Dan Bahat vigorously
defends the traditional location - drawing on his years of experience
and study of the entire city and its history. -
Templemount.org
Book:
Jerusalem - The Temple Mount - The authoritative text
of JERUSALEM: THE TEMPLE MOUNT contains priceless information and
is richly documented with detailed maps, plans and stunningly evocative
reconstructive illustrations. An artistic masterpiece in itself,
this important addition to the scant literature on the Temple Mount
will be equally appreciated by Jerusalem residents, tourists and
armchair travellers.
Book:
The Quest: Revealing the Temple Mount in Jerusalem - No
book is better suited to the study, understanding and development
of the manmade plateau that is the focus of the world s interest
the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Ritmeyer's experience as architect
of the Temple Mount Excavations following the Six-Day War, coupled
with his exploration of parts of the mount now hardly accessible
and his doctoral research into the problems of the Temple Mount
make him singularly qualified for the task.
Arguments Against
Pending research...
Research Links Against the Theory:
Northern Location
Based on a number of topological and archaeological considerations,
research by Dr. Asher Kaufman over the past two decades has resulted
in serious consideration being given to a site 330 feet to the north
of the Dome of the Rock. The Mt. Moriah bedrock outcrops within the
Dome of Rock, as is well known. Although the bedrock elevation drops
sharply to the south in the direction of the City of David, the level
of the bedrock is just beneath the paving stones for over 100 meters
to the North of the Dome of the Rock shrine. One particular level outcropping
of this bedrock lies under a small Islamic shrine known as "The Dome
of the Tablets" or "The Dome of the Spirits," to the Arabs. Both names
suggest an association with the Jewish Temples. It is under this small,
unimpressive canopy supported by pillars that Dr. Kaufman locates the
Temple site. -
Templemount.org
Arguments For
The
Third Temple Entrance In Alignment With The East Gate - This author
presents the information which places the Holy of Holies at the Dome of
the Spirits/Dome of the Tablets and is lined up with the Golden Gate directly
to the East.
The Dome of the Spirits This small dome, also called the Dome of the
Tablets, has attracted interest because of Asher Kaufman’s
theory that it marks the place of the Holy of Holies in the Second Temple.
The dome is located on the east-west line from the peak of the Mt. of
Olives through the
Golden Gate to the two domes of the Holy Sepulcher on the west.
Upon the peak of Olivet, according to the Mishnah, the High Priest used
to stand when he sacrificed the Red Heifer. During this ceremony, he
would have had to look into the Holy of Holies and sprinkle the blood
in its direction; the Temple should have lined up, then, with the peak.
Kaufman adduced archaeological data to support the theory that the Temple
was here, but it has not gained wide acceptance, partly because of the
topography. We know from Warren’s investigations (1868) that a
little to the north was a moat, extending St. Anne’s Valley. Herod
filled it in, but it was probably there in Solomon’s time. Assuming
the Second Temple was built where the First had been, the north side
of Solomon’s Temple, if here, would have been on the slope, slightly
below the peak and asymmetrically close to this moat. Without more archaeology,
however, no one can be certain where the Temple was.
Dome of the Spirit - Jerusalem - This little dome, about 10
feet in diameter, has been called the “Dome of the Spirit”
and the “Dome of the Tablets” for many centuries. Some
archeologists believe it was the actual site of the Holy of Holies,
for three reasons:
(1) it is in perfect alignment with the ancient East Gate
(2) it is the only place on the Temple Mount where the floor
is solid bedrock, just like the threshing floor that King David
purchased as the site for the altar, II Sam. 24:24
(3) the dome stands 330 feet north of the Dome of the Rock,
allowing enough room to rebuild the Jewish temple on this site
if one would “leave out the court which is outside the
Temple” as God instructed John, Rev. 11:2.
Dome Of the Spirits, or Tablets
With the temple placed such that the Holy of Holies is located on the
Dome of the Spirits, this is what it would look like. Put together with
Revelation 11:1-2 we have a location that fits with Bible prophecy such
that if the outer court is not built for this third temple, it fits right
next to the Dome of the Rock and the Holy of Holies lines up perfectly with
the Golden Gate, or East gate.
Revelation 11:1-2 And there was
given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise,
and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship
therein. But the court which is without the temple leave
out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles:
and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.
Research Links For the theory:
Arguments Against
Pending research...
Research Links Against the theory:
Fountain Location
This view puts the temple over the Al Kas Fountain between the Dome of
the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque.
This view has been put forth by several people, including Tuvia
Sagiv and Norma Robertson. It places the temple to the South of the Dome
of the Rock in place of the Al Aqsa Mosque.
Arguments For
Secrets of the Temple Mount by Tuvia
Sagiv
Locating Solomon’s Temple by Norma Robertson
Research Links For the Theory:
Locating Solomon's Temple - This page shows a progression through
time of the temple under this theory with pictures depicting how it
looked.
The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot by Ernest L. Martin was released
in 1994 and presented an alternative view based on interpretations of the
writings of Flavius Josephus and others as well as archaeological evidence
that the first and second temples were not located on the traditionally
accepted location of the temple mount.
Honestly I find the subject fascinating if not somewhat overwhelming
not having the greatest grasp of history and archaeology, but given the
potential impact on the future state of the prophetic rebuilding of the
temple in Jerusalem, I feel it’s important to look into it.
Arguments For
“It (Jerusalem) is now demolished to the very
foundations, and hath nothing left but that monument of it preserved,
I mean the camp of those (Romans) that
hath destroyed it, which still dwells upon its ruins.” |
Eleazer Ben Jair (Commander at Masada)
“Now as to the Tower of Antonia, it might seem to be composed of several cities.
For if we go up to this Tower of Antonia, we gain the city since we
shall then be upon the top of the hill.” |
Josephus
“Now as to the tower of Antonia, it was situated at the corner of two cloisters
(colonnades) of the court of the temple;
of that on the west, and that on the north.” |
Josephus
Acts 21:32 At once he
(the commander) took along some soldiers
and centurians and ran down to them.
The Gihon Spring
Gihon means "Gusher" and it is a siphon spring that could pump water
40 stories, 400 feet from the bottom of the Gihon up to the City of David.
The Pool of Siloam
The area is an acre in size. The archaeologist who found it said, "It's
the world's largest mikvah." This is fitting for the large number of people
who would have to ritually bathe to go to the temple. Furthermore, where
this only natural source of water in Jerusalem is, is about 1/3 of a mile
from the Temple Mount. The temple would have to be close to the mikvah to
prevent becoming unclean on the way to the temple. They also found the original
stairs from the Herodian period going from the Pool of Siloam up to the
city of David.
Hezekiah’s Tunnel
Hezekiah’s Tunnel, part of Jerusalem’s water system, is located under
the City of David. It connects the Gihon Spring—Jerusalem’s fresh water
supply—with the Siloam Pool. According to 2 Chronicles 32:2–4 and 2 Kings
20:20, this tunnel was dug during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah to
prepare Jerusalem for the imminent attack of the Assyrian king, Sennacherib.
In the Bible, Hezekiah redirected the water through old and newly dug Jerusalem
tunnels.
Film:
Jerusalem and the Lost Temple of Jews (Watch
free now with Amazon Prime) - This compelling video calls into question
the common beliefs of the location of the original temples being on
the temple mount. Spurred by the studies and book,
The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot by Ernest L. Martin, Ken Klein
walks through the key evidence from the historical writings of Flavius
Josephus and others while actually walking through and filming in Jerusalem.
Book:
TEMPLE: Amazing New Discoveries That Change Everything About the Location
of Solomon’s Temple - Can you imagine the upheaval in political
and religious thinking if the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is not the site
of Solomon’s and Herod’s temples? And what if the stones of the
Wailing Wall are not what tradition says? In this highly-researched,
exciting book, the author proposes from current archaeological excavations
and Scriptural corroboration that the true temple location is not where
tradition teaches. This is must reading for anyone who wants to fit
together the pieces of biblical records, current geo-polotics, and prophecy.
The Coming Temple! Where the Real Jewish Temple Stood in David's City
YouTube - Toward the end of the video, they move
to some speculative theories about the
abomination of desolation that I don't hold to, but for the most
part it’s a good video with lots of good information. Filmed
in the Old City of Jerusalem, this ground-breaking documentary investigates
the research of renowned Biblical archaeologists, Bob Cornuke, David
Seilaff and Earnest L. Martin who claim that Solomon and Herod’s
Temples never stood on the Haram al Sharif, also known as the Temple
Mount. If they are right, then there is nothing to stop the Jewish people
building their long awaited for Third Jewish Temple in the actual site
where the Temples once stood. But is tradition too strong?
The Temple | Bob Cornuke YouTube - Can you imagine the upheaval
in political and religious thinking if the Temple Mount in Jerusalem
is not the site of Solomon's and Herod's temples? And what if the stones
of the Wailing Wall are not what tradition says? In this highly-researched,
exciting book, the author proposes from current archaeological excavations
and Scriptural corroboration that the true temple location is not where
tradition teaches.
Arguments Against
1 Kings 8:1,6 Then Solomon assembled
the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of
the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem,
that they might
bring up
the ark of the covenant of the LORD
out of the city of David, which
is Zion. … And the priests brought
in the ark of the covenant of the LORD unto his place, into the oracle
of the house, to the most holy place, even under the wings of
the cherubims.
From this passage, it would seem that the City of David was below the
temple.
“Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21
Watchman Bible Study | 2005 - 2024
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. Ref.