Daniel 9: 70 Weeks Determined for Israel and JerusalemVisions of Daniel and John through time I’ve excerpted Daniel 9 below without verses as it was originally. If you would like to read it with verse numbers and inline Hebrew definitions, read it at Blue Letter Bible. Daniel 9 I want to add a recent find of writings by Rick Lanser MDiv at the Associates for Biblical Research site where he has a collection of studies titled The Daniel 9:24-27 Project. These very thoughtful, researched, and detailed studies put my overview to shame and I was pleasently surprised to find validation in that research to match some of my conclusions. I won’t attempt to rewrite his detailed research here, but I will include some of his points. I think it is important in studying this chapter to recognize throughout the focus on Israel and Jerusalem. These are Daniel’s people and the city recently destroyed by the Babylonians where the first temple was destroyed. Given the extended nature of the prophecy to the end times, it is sometimes easy to skip over the Jewish nature of this prophecy and indeed the whole prayer and supplication of Daniel. Much focus is on the last four verses of this chapter as they are the actual prophecy. It is important to note that there is no other period of seven years defined in scripture to compare this prophecy to. For this reason the context of this prophecy is doubly important as there is no real cross reference for it and I believe it is central to the whole scenario of the completion of God’s plan for Israel and indeed the world. I believe that it is primarily to this prophecy that Yeshua points when speaking of the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet when He is asked, “when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?” So context from within scripture is critical to properly interpret what this prophecy means for the coming times. Seventy Years ProphesiedThe first two verses of this chapter setup the time frame of the revealing of the 70 weeks prophecy. There is debate on who exactly Darius the son of Ahasuerus is, but he is believed to be an unnamed ruler outside the Biblical record following Cyrus the Great’s conquering of Babylon following Belshazzar’s feast from Daniel 5 where the writing was on the wall. So this would be the first year following the conquering of Babylon by Cyrus and Darius the Mede “was made king” (posess, reign, consult, rule, govern H4427) over the realm of the Chaldeans. This is not placing him as king to the extent of Cyrus the Great or others major rulers, but more of a ruler or governor over the realm of the Chaldeans following Cyrus conquering Babylon. In the context of the overall visions of Daniel and John, this was the transition from the third head of Babylon to the fourth head of Medo-Persia in Revelation 17 and from the head of gold to the breast and arms of silver in Daniel 2. It was at this time of transition of power of the Gentile kingdoms over Jerusalem that Daniel looked back to the prophecy from Jeremiah regarding the desolations of Jerusalem. Jeremiah 25:1-13 2 Chronicles 36:15-21 As seen throughout their history, Israel’s breaking of the covenant they agreed to with God at Mount Sinai led to the Gentile nations control over them and the land. In the case of the Babylonians, the complete destruction of Jerusalem and Solomon’s temple were decreed, yet for those carried away into Babylon, they were told specifically to settle into their captivity and live peaceable lives in Babylon with the promise to return Jeremiah 29:1-11 Seventy Years FulfilledDaniel took the Word of God seriously and recognized Jeremiah’s prophecy as reality to the year. Seventy years were to be accomplished in the desolations of Jerusalem and he knew that those full seventy years would be accomplished. In recognizing that the seventy years was almost up, and knowing the mercy of God and righteous judgment for the sins of Israel, Daniel comes before the Lord with a contrite heart confessing the sins of the people of Israel. I think it’s an important example of how we can approach God in our lives as well, in humility and recognition of His Word and righteous judgements. As obedient Christians filled with His Spirit, we are to love God and other people, even those who would consider us enemies. When we fail in either of these we should come before God confessing and recognizing His loving kindness and mercy according to His Word, trusting His forgiveness and turning away from those sins while asking for His help and guidance to accomplish His will for our lives. In the case of Daniel, he was centuries removed from the arrival of the Messiah and the fulfillment of God’s plan for mankind. In his mind, the focus was on Israel and Jerusalem and the last word given was not to listen to the prophets and diviners in Israel’s midst in captivity or to trust their dreams. Daniel desired to know God’s plan for His people Israel. Daniel’s Prayer, Supplications, and Confession for IsraelI think it’s important for the sake of context to understand Daniel’s mindset in asking forgiveness. Daniel set his face to seek the Lord with prayer, supplications, fasting, sackcloth, and ashes. In this prayer Daniel recognizes the characteristics and actions of the Lord.
Daniel also recognizes the sins of his people and reminds God of His characteristics and asks forgiveness because the judgments for their sins were just. Daniel recognizes the sins of Israel.
The Covenants and CommandmentsLet’s not gloss over Daniel’s prayer to jump to the last four verses, because there are some very important points that may change how one reads them. God has made several covenants with the earth and Israel.
Given these covenant, what is in Daniel’s mind while he is praying and repenting for Israel’s rebellion? The Adamic and Davidic covenants are not relevant in this case, the damage was done and prophecy given. The Noahic and Abrahamic covenants were unconditional. The New Covenant was not yet on the scene and so Daniel wouldn’t be referring to this. That leaves the land and Mosaic covenants as contenders to Daniel’s prayer. These two covenants are somewhat tied together in terms of the Babylonian captivity, both promise captivity for rebellion and return for repentance. However, Daniel was very explicit in the recognition of Israel’s rebellion tied to turning from the law of Moses and the punishment that came in the judgement promised to Israel that she accepted in the wilderness. The first point is that Israel turned from God and failed to live up to the covenant they made and agreed to at Mount Sinai, the Mosaic Covenant. God did not fail to live up to the covenant nor did He stop the judgments decreed as a result of Israel breaking the covenant. In fact, Daniel makes it clear these are tied together. Daniel 9:4,11-12 Daniel asks according to God’s righteousness for Him to turn His anger away from Jerusalem, His holy mountain for his sake, not for Israel’s righteousness, but God’s great mercies. Interestingly, Gabriel also ties Jerusalem to God’s holy mountain in concert with Daniel, which is important in understanding the unfaithful woman who rides the beast from Revelation 17-18. God, through His messenger Gabriel, answered Daniel’s prayer and revealed through this amazing prophecy covering only four verses of scripture, the future of Israel from the order to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Triumphal Entry (69 weeks of years), and a final week of years, the 70th week of Daniel. This prophecy is studied in more detail in the 70 Weeks of Daniel prophecy as part of the HIStory, Our Future Bible studies, and the verse 24 regarding the event to occur within this 70 weeks is covered below. Seventy Weeks: Seventy Sabbatical Year CyclesThe word translated as weeks is H7620, sabua, meaning a heptad or period of seven days or years. We see this first introduced in the context of Israel at Mount Sinai where God delivered the commandments for Israel to follow in addition to the 10 commandments. Exodus 23:10-13 Notice that this period of seven is tied both to years and days. First in a sequential period of seven years for the land (six years and one year rest), and second a sequential period of seven days for man (six days work and one day rest). This is also tied to when they enter the Promised Land in Leviticus 25:1-7, which is explicitlly called the sabbath of the land. Interestingly, failure to obey these commandments from God resulted in punishments as part of the Mosaic Covenant Israel made with God at Mount Sinai. Leviticus 26:14-18, 32-35 It was this very reason that led to Daniel and all of Israel’s exile in Babylon and his prayer of repentance for his people and petition from God to understand what the future was for Israel and Jerusalem. Prior to the Babylonian captivity, Israel had failed to keep the land sabbath for 490 years, meaning 70 sabbath rests for the land had been missed and so the captivity was the promise kept to give the land the rest that it had missed because of their disobedience. 2 Chronicles 36:15-23 It follows then that since the 70 weeks prophecy is tied to the sabbatical years and obedience of God’s commands, that the 70 weeks would begin when both the command to restore and build Jerusalem and obedience to the statutes given are being followed. It should be noted that in all the cases where weeks (sabua) is used in scripture, it is speaking of a period of contiguous time. It is sometimes multiple weeks, but the number of weeks defines a starting point to an ending point without any gaps. In Genesis 29:27 we have the story of Jacob’s work to wed Rachel. In this one verse we see the same word week tied to seven years that Jacob had to work to fulfill that week. This term is used similarly throughout the 20 times it is used in 17 verses. The seventy weeks of Daniel is broken out into 3 sets of weeks and unless otherwise defined in the context of the scripture itself, they should be considered a contiguous counting of time from the start to the end. The first two periods of weeks appear to be connected to each other, seven weeks and 62 weeks. This period of 69 weeks total is the counting of weeks “from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince.” There’s no clear reason why the 7 is mentioned separately from the 62 except perhaps to make the point that these weeks are sabbatical in nature. Exodus 34:21-22 The feast of weeks is what most Christians know as Pentecost. It is the end of a period of seven sabbath’s (49 days + 50th day holy covocation) counted from the feast of firstfruits. Interestingly, in 30 AD the feast of firstfruits fell on the Sunday of the resurrection of Yeshua, who is the firstfruits of them that slept. 1 Corinthians 15:20 And it was at the feast of weeks 50 days later that the Holy Spirit came and filled the believers in the upper room. For more on dating the crucifixion, I recommend reading the whole study on the spring feasts of Israel. Similar to the weeks of days, there is also a weeks of years where the same pattern of 49 + 1 is applied to determine the year of jubilee. Leviticus 25:8-13 So we see this pattern of sabbath days and years as an unbroken counting of time. In the case of the 70 weeks prophecy, Gabriel splits the 70 weeks into smaller parts, but those three periods should not be assumed to be split such that there are gaps between two parts of either the 7, 62, or 1 weeks of years. “We begin by first affirming a key finding of this study, discussed in Part 1 of “The Going Forth of Artaxerxes’ Decree.” It presented the case that the “weeks” of Daniel 9:24–27 should be understood as sabbatical year cycles following a fixed schedule, not arbitrary periods of seven years. ... Seventy Years ScopeJust what is the span of time for the prophecy given by God through Gabriel to Daniel? How do we know it’s not over already? I will attempt to answer those questions by showing the original Hebrew definitions for the words used, showing that not all the things listed as prerequisites to the ending of the 70 weeks are fulfilled as of yet. This eliminates the possibility that all prophecy is fulfilled and further places the final seven years in our future, or as I believe you will see, currently unfolding. Daniel 9:24 There are two parts to this passage. The first deals with the subject, Israel and Jerusalem, once again an important scope of this prophecy. The second deals with the events that must be fulfilled by the completion of the 70 weeks of years. These are AND conditions. As with Boolean expressions, each and every one must be fulfilled for the prophecy to be complete. That prophecy is encased in this 70 weeks timeframe. to finish the transgression
Taken in the generic context of transgression being finished, I’ve personally seen enough sin in my life to recognize that this isn’t fulfilled entirely yet. However, the specific context of this prophecy given to Daniel is determined upon Israel and Jerusalem. The rebellion and sin of Israel as a nation, which is their lack of acceptance and obedience to the promised Messiah they rejected, will be over after the remnant of Israel calls upon the name of the Lord, accepting Yeshua as their Messiah. Yeshua said that this would be when Israel would see Him again. Matthew 23:37-39 The end of the 69th week came at the beginning of Yeshua’s ministry in 27 AD. 2½ years later Yeshua was crucified on Passover in 30 AD. Just before this, He declared Israel’s blindness. Luke 19:41-44 | Romans 11:1-11 | 2 Corinthians 3:12-18 Some say that the 70th week was fulfilled at various historical times, whether the time of the Maccabees, 30 AD, or 70 AD, but the fact that Israel is still blinded and has not accepted Yeshua points to this 70th week being yet unfulfilled. Moreover, it is only after the last 3½ years of the week when the wrath of God is poured out that Israel will be brought out of the wilderness of protection and dwell in Jerusalem with their Messiah, having called on Him after being wooed in the wilderness protected from the dragon for 3½ years. Revelation 12:14-17 | Hosea 2:14-23 | Isaiah 35:1-10 | Jeremiah 30:23-31:14 Another angle on this could be seen as the time of Jacob’s trouble, that leads to the remnant of Israel being protected in the wilderness and triggers the whole tribulation that would cause them to turn back to the Lord. Taken in context of the same word used throughout the Old Testament, it should better read "to restrain and shut up the transgression/sin." It seems pretty generic to restrain sin, but what if this is another way fo saying that because Israel is blinded, their sin is not fully put on them? So when is the transgression no longer restrained? Perhaps when the restrainer is taken out of the way? This calls to mind Michael the restrainer, who stands for the people of Israel, that is taken out of the way and triggering the abomination of desolation. We are told this is an unparalleled time in Judea related to Israel and that it’s the ultimate personification of transgression, the man of sin declaring himself god and the world worshipping him. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-14 It highlights the possibility that some such as Chris White have posited that the man of sin will present himself as the Jewish messiah, being the great deception, and literally coming in his own name and being accepted by Israel after rejecting the Messiah. John 5:43 If the 2/3 cut off in Zechariah 13:8-9 speaks more to those of Israel worshipping the false Messiah and thereby being the natural branches cut off from the root, Romans 11, then this could all be related. In addition to those refusing would be cut off in the killed sense while 1/3 of Israel would be protected in the wilderness. to make an end of sins
Obviously in terms of sins no longer happening it is not fulfilled, even in the millennium there will be sin against God. However, this prophecy is focused on Israel and Jerusalem. The end of Israel’s sins has not come to pass and God is not done with His chosen people. Jeremiah 31:31-40, Zechariah 13:8-9, Zechariah 12:10-14, Matthew 23:37-39. I think this ties in pretty well with the idea that many Christians have against a rebuilt temple. They say, "that was done away with by Christ!" I agree, but we live in a temporal world stuck in space-time. Israel is not there yet. They still corporately reject their Messiah and look to the old ways that were always insufficient and a foreshadow of the fulfillment in the chief cornerstone that was rejected. Until they recognize Him, they are atoning for sin insufficiently. When they are taken to the wilderness and protected and the bride is caught up to meet the Messiah, the remnant that fled Judea will mourn for Him and be refined through the fire of God’s wrath. They will come to accept Him and when the 1,260 days of protection are fulfilled, they will enter into the promised land with their Messiah ruling and He will remember their sins no more. to make reconciliation for iniquity
I believe this was accomplished by Christ on the cross. He made reconciliation possible for us who live in iniquity. Looking at the context of other passages using these words, I would say this has a lot to do with the acceptance of the ultimate sacrifice foreshadowed in the daily sacrifices. Reconciliation for iniquity may have happened 2,000 years ago, but in the context of Israel, they are blinded to it until they seek His face. Hosea 5:15 to bring in everlasting righteousness
This is specifically the bringing in of everlasting righteousness, which I believe was begun with Christ’s sacrifice. Not necessarily the fulfillment of nothing but righteousness. However, the fullness of this righteousness will be seen for eternity after the millennium. In the context of Israel and Jerusalem, it would seem this would be fulfilled when Israel has come out of the 70th week recognizing their Messiah and the eternal sacrifice that has redeemed them to Him. to seal up the vision and prophecy
In context of Israel and Jerusalem, the end of the 70 weeks is the natural and wild branches eternally connected/grafted to the root which is Christ. The Old Testament prophets had visions related to Israel and her redemption such as this from Daniel and many times is clearly stated to be related to Israel. Once Israel has accepted Yeshua, there is no more dealing with Jew and Gentile in Christ apart from each other. Just dealing with the unbelieving world apart from God’s eternal family from all nations, tribes and tongues. The very nature of a vision, dream, or revelation signifies that the thing being seen has not occurred yet, once it happens it is no longer prophetic but now history. The very nature of Bible prophecy is that which occurs in earth space-time. So to seal up or make an end to these things means that those things we have in scripture now must be fulfilled prior to the end of the 70th week of Daniel’s prophecy given to him by God through the angel Gabriel. Almost all of Revelation is contained within the 70 weeks timeframe. There are explanations of what will happen after the 70 weeks, but mostly descriptive of what it will be like. Not the kind of prophecy we see describing, in great detail, the period of time prior to Christ’s return to earth to rule. I believe the sealing of the vision and prophecy comes when Christ does. Revelation 19:10
Testimony (G3141) Once Christ is here, there will be no need for record or report or evidence because Christ will dwell among us on the earth from that point till they are destroyed. So if our report of Christ is prophecy (since all prophecy revolves around Christ), then that will end when Christ’s presence is His own testimony and prophecy will be fulfilled among us. to anoint the most Holy
What is the most Holy? I did a search through scripture to see where else “most Holy” is used and what it is in reference to. My conclusion is that the most Holy is the physical location of the holy of Holies on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. I believe the anointing of the holy of Holies will be when Christ steps His feet on the Mount of Olives and enters through the Golden Gate into the temple, His throne for the next 1,000 years. He is worthy and indeed was the One who’s presence rested there in Old Testament times. Here is a quick breakdown of “most Holy.” “Most Holy” is found 45 times in 43 verses in the Old Testament.
So as you can see, the majority of times in scripture speaking of the “most Holy” are discussing the area of the temple or adjectives describing things associated with it such as the burnt offerings that were given there and the eating of these most Holy offerings. Clearly something that must be anointed must be physical. And indeed the majority of times the Bible talks about “most Holy,” it is in reference to the physical location of the temple and more specifically, the holy of Holies, where the Lord dwelt among Israel all that time ago. He will return to rule from there as well. This could be several things in context to the end of the 70th week appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. We know that Yeshua will rule the world with a rod of Iron from Jerusalem so it could be the anointing of His habitation there. Ezekiel speaks of a temple larger in scope than any historical temple in great detail and given the temple was to be crafted after the temple in heaven, the Messianic temple and the most holy place from where Yeshua will reign could be anointed. This will be the start of the 7th day according to the Lord so it could be the anointing of the millennial Sabbath rest. It very well could be all of these things together, ushering in the millennial reign of Christ at the very end of the 70th week when Israel enters into the promised land accepting Yeshua as their Messiah and fulfilling the promise made to Israel and ending the prophecies and visions in the 7th day. Babylonian Captivity to Messiah (458 BC - 30 AD)Daniel 9:25 Chapter 25 is the first in a set of ordered events Daniel is given to understand the future of Israel and Jerusalem. The start of this is the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem. A period of 69 weeks, depicted as 7 and 62 follows until the Messiah. The commandment to restore and build JerusalemIsaiah 44:21-45:6 Daniel knew God would keep His promises and redeem His people, and he knew it would be after seventy years His Word would be accomplished. This prophecy from the Lord through Isaiah was around 150 years before Cyrus II (550 - 530 BC) even came to power, let alone was born, so Daniel also knew when Cyrus conquered Babylon what was coming, he just wanted to know Israel and Jerusalem’s future. First Decree of Cyrus (539 BC)Ezra 1:1-11 Clearly Isaiah’s prophecy had a profound effect on Cyrus and while many would have a hard time accepting it, the Cyrus Cylinder reads like a great king with his own idea of gods having found favor from this Israel God and believing it, although putting his own spin on things. “Marduk, ex[alted one, the Enlil of the God]s, roamed through all the places that had been abandoned, (and upon seeing this) reconciled his anger and showed mercy to the people of Sumer and Akkad who had become (as) corpses. He sought and looked through all the lands, searching for a righteous king whose hand he could grasp. He called to rule Cyrus, king of Anshan, and announced his name as the king of the universe. He made the Guti-land and all the Medes (Ummanmanda) bow in submission at his feet and so (Cyrus) assiduously looked after the justice and well-being of the Black-Headed People over whom he had been made victorious (by Marduk). And Marduk, the great lord, leader of his people, looked happily at the good deeds and steadfast mind of Cyrus and ordered him to march to his own city Babylon, set him on the road to Babylon, and went alongside him like a friend and companion. His teeming army, uncounted like water (flowing) in a river, marched with him fully armed. (Marduk) allowed him to enter Babylon without battle or fight, sparing his own city of Babylon from hardship, and delivered Nabonidus, who had not worshipped him, into his hands. ... The great lord Marduk, who loves Babylon, with great magnanimity, established (it) as (my) destiny, and I sought to worship him each day. ... (And) as for the citizens of Babylon … whom (Nabonidus) had made subservient in a manner (totally) unsuited to them against the will of the gods, I released them from their weariness and loosened their burden. The great lord Marduk rejoiced in my deeds. Kindly he blessed me, Cyrus, the king, his worshipper ... From [Babylon] to Ashur and Susa, Agade, Eshnunna, the cities of Zamban, Meturnu, Der as far as the borders of the Gutians – I returned to these sanctuaries on the other side of the Tigris, sanctuaries founded in ancient times, the images that had been in them there and I made their dwellings permanent. I also gathered all their people and returned to them their habitations.” This was also recorded by Josephus in Antiquities 11.1.1-2. It was in the fall of 540 BC (Wikipedia) that Cyrus captured Babylon without a fight and so this first decree is around that time as well, 539 BC (Wikipedia), since it was the first year of his reign. This decree of Cyrus, however, seemed focused on the temple in Jerusalem while Gabriel said the command to restore and rebuild Jersualem with the caveat that the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. Second Decree of Darius (518 BC)This decree was a recapitulation of the decree of Cyrus because of locals hindering the rebuilding. They wrote a letter to Darius I (29 September 522 BC – October 486 BC) asking if Cyrus had really allowed the rebuilding. Ezra 5:6-17 The search was made and the response given. Ezra 6:1-17 Again, this speaks only to the temple, although it does hint at the troublesome times the Jews were having in just building the temple at the time. It was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius I on the third day of Adar, February 19, 516 BC, that the temple was completed. Third Decree of Artaxerxes (458-7 BC)I owe my understanding of the 457 BC date, and not the more widely accepted 458 BC date, to Rick Lanser, MDiv. His article Did Ezra Come to Jerusalem in 457 BC? from The Daniel 9:24-27 Project series of articles is highly recommended along with the rest of the articles in the series. I don’t agree with everything, but very important work. The main thrust of the reasoning is the significance of double-dating by the Jews of foreign kings according to their civil calendar beginning in Tishri in September/October, whereas the Babylonian and Persian regnal years were counted in Nisanu in March/April. The Jews counted their own Jewish kings in Abib/Nisan in March/April. The point is reinforced from scripture as laid out in Elephantine papyri and Daniel 8:14 by Siegfried H. Horn, Ph.D. in a 1981 article in Ministry Magazine that Rick Lanser points out in the above referenced article. It is established that Artaxerxes’ first regnal year was from spring of 464 BC to the spring of 463 BC according to the regnal counting of the Persians in the spring. So his seventh year was spring of 458 BC to spring of 457 BC. Pre-exile, the Jews had two calendars, the religious from spring to spring as dictated by the statutes given to them by God, and the civil calendar that ran from fall to fall, exactly 6 months apart between the spring and fall. From fall to spring varied due to the lunar-solar calendar having to sync up around the vernal equinox since the beginning of the religious calendar was tied to the firstfruits of the harvest. See the appointed times study. The pre-exilic is seen in the capture of Jerusalem in 597 BC, which the Babylonians dated to the seventh year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, while the Hebrew reckoning in 1 Kings 24:12 puts it in the eighth year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign. We see this again at the end of the captivity in Nehemiah 1:1-3 where he finds out the state of Jerusalem in the month of Chisleu, or Chislev - the 9th month, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes. Later in Nehemiah 2:1-8 the king notices his sadness at the news of Jerusalem and this is stated to be in the month of Nisan, the 1st month, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes. Chislev is 2 months after Tishri, the 7th month. If the twentieth year was reckoned by Persian standards, Nisan would be the start of the twentieth year of Artaxerxes reign and Chislev would be 9 months into his reign. So Nehemiah would have been sad about the state of Jerusalem 9 months before he heard about it. Unless he reckoned Artaxerxes twentieth year according to the Hebrew reckoning for foreign kings as starting in Tishri on the new year for the civil calendar. Then he would have heard about Jerusalem in the 2nd month of Artaxerxes reign according to the Hebrew reckoning and been sad before the king 4 months later in Nisan, in the 6th month of his twentieth year. With this in mind, according to the Jewish counting of Gentile kings, Artaxerxes seventh year according to the scriptures we get the number from, began on Tishri 1 458 BC through 457 BC. We aren’t told exactly when the third decree was given, but we are told that it is in this seventh year of his reign that Ezra the priest and scribe went from Babylon to Jerusalem with priests and Levites, singers, porters, Nethinims, and ministers of this house of God. Leaving on the first day of the first month of Abib/Nisan (March 9, 457 BC) and arrived in Jerusalem on the first day of the fifth month of Av (July 5, 457 BC). Ezra 7:1-10 So the decree had to be given between Tishri 458 BC and Abib/Nisan 457 BC since in his journey he had a letter of that decree from Artaxerxes to be put into force at his arrival. Ezra 7:11-28 With the temple already completed 58 years prior, this decree would have seemed to be an offering for Israel to give to God and to further build up Jerusalem, although it’s not really stated as such. The command that “whatsoever shall seem good to thee, and to thy brethren, to do with the rest of the silver and the gold, that do after the will of your God” would seem to be an open command not related to the temple, which was completed, but for the rest of the city. The scholarly consensus for the date of Artaxerxes decree is 458 BC. Add 483 years, we arrive at 26 AD, although Associates for Biblical Research presents a compelling case for a 457 BC date as well, which would be 27 AD. They also hold that it was this third decree, Artaxerxes’s first, that is referred to in the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecy. More here. Fourth Decree of Artaxerxes (445 BC)In the twentieth year of the reign of Artaxerxes I (465 - 424 BC) king of Persia Nehemiah, the king’s cup bearer, was sad thinking of Jerusalem still laid waste, although the temple had been rebuilt 71 years prior. So around November of 444 BC, Nehemiah learned of the state of Jerusalem and about four months later in March or April of 445 BC he petitioned the king. Notice how similar his prayer and supplication is to Daniel’s. Nehemiah 1:1-2:10 Daniel 9:25 stated that from the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem to the Messiah would be 69 weeks with the additional mention of the street and walls being built in troublesome times. In Nehemiah 2:17-20 he reveals his plan to rebuilt the wall and Nehemiah 3 speaks to the work that was done. Nehemiah 4-5 speaks to the troublesome times during this time. However, this decree in April, 445 BC was a reinforcement of first decree Artaxerxes made even though it actually declared and gave the letters to Nehemiah would be the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem followed by the street and walls being built in troublsome times. So the original decree in 457 BC would be that given to Ezra, later reinforced through Nehemiah. “Since sabbatical years were always counted from the first of Tishri, if the “sevens” of Daniel 9 are sabbatical year cycles, their restart in the postexilic period must be counted from that date in some year. That year was determined from the study in “Did Ezra Come to Jerusalem in 457 BC?,” which indicated that Artaxerxes’ seventh regnal year was 458–457 BC, and the decree promulgated during it was the only one that can be connected with both the rebuilding of Jerusalem and its restoration. This restoration was essentially a spiritual one, with Ezra serving as God’s agent to accomplish it. He did this by bringing with him a full complement of Levites, intensively teaching the people the precepts of the Law, and insisting that they be followed to the letter. Therefore, it was after Ezra’s arrival in 457 BC that the sabbatical year cycles stipulated by the Law were initiated, not after Nehemiah’s later construction-focused arrival in 444. We cannot use 444 BC as the anchor point for the start of the Seventy Weeks count. Divisions of the Seventy Weeks“So, what do the first 49 years signify? My view is that the Lord directed Gabriel to set off the first seven weeks from the 62 that followed to mark the completion of a Jubilee of seven sabbatical cycles. In this way he provided us with a hint that the remaining 62 and one final week are also to be interpreted as sabbatical year cycles. Since a Jubilee merges seamlessly into the sabbatical year that follows it, yet at the same time can be regarded as a unit on its own, the “seven weeks and sixty-two weeks” should be linked seamlessly together to fill the period “from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, until Messiah the Prince”—up to the time of His manifestation at His baptism. The Messiah the PrinceIt is not really defined what exactly the end point is, but there are some ideas put forward. Yeshua’s BirthLuke 2:6-14 The savior is declared to the shepherds in the field and technically this is the arrival to the earth of the Messiah and the wise men follow some time later to worship Him. However, this does not seem to me to be the focus of the arrival of the Messiah in the prophecy. While His conception and birth were clearly prophesied and known to many, this was only the start of His first coming and the fulfillment of it and the arrival of the Kingdom of God seems more apt to me. Yeshua’s Baptism and Ministry StartingMatthew 3:13-17 This is the point of recognition by God of His Son publically after He is baptized into His ministry by John the Baptist, who was the representation of Elijah preparing the way for the Lord. Malachi 4:5-6 | Luke 1:15-17 | Matthew 17:10-13 Based on a 4 BC birth of Christ and the statement in Luke 3:23 that He was about thirty when He started His ministry, this would have taken place in the fall of 27 AD. We can also look at the crucifixion that was on Wednesday, April 5, 30 AD and the three Passovers that John says Yeshua participated in.
This is in agreement with His ministry starting that previous fall in 27 AD when He was about thirty years old, which lines up with the arrival of the Messiah 483 years after the decree of Artaxerxes I in 457 BC. This also gives us a view of Christ’s ministry being for 2½ years. “...when we count 69 sabbatical year cycles forward from 457 BC, we find the final year of those 69 weeks of years spans Tishri 1 (September 30), AD 26 through Elul 29 (September 19), AD 27. Therefore, the prophecy of Daniel’s 70 Weeks informs us that the Messiah could not be manifested until Tishri 1, the Feast of Trumpets, AD 27 at the earliest.” | Daniel 9:24-27: The Sixty-Ninth and Seventieth Weeks, Rick Lanser MDiv Yeshua’s Presentation as Messiah at Triumphal EntryZechariah 9:9 This seems to be the point at which Yeshua makes a point to present Himself as the Messiah to Jerusalem as Israel was gathered there for the coming Passover feast. This was the 10th of Nisan, April 1, 30 AD. Sir Robert Anderson’s book The Coming Prince used the second decree of Artaxerxes given to Nehemiah in 445 BC as the starting point for this prophecy and the trimphal entry as the ending point. However, he placed the crucifixion year in 32 AD in which 14 Nisan fell on a Monday, not a Wednesday. The only way to get close in this calculation is to take a 360-day year, but even that doesn’t quite fit. There are reported problems with the calculations in The Coming Prince and some others that have similar start and end times that don’t quite calculate out to the 30 AD crucifixion. Counting days back from April 1, 30 AD (10 Nisan - triumphal entry):
Counting years back from April 1, 30 AD:
It would seem that the option from Artaxerxes first decree in 457 BC to the start of Yeshua’s ministry fits the best, but it’s not really that critical when looking at the overall prophecy. What I do think is important is that from the order to restore and build Jerusalem to the Messiah is 69 weeks. It is after that 69 weeks that the Messiah is crucified for our sins. Daniel 9:26a Destruction of Jerusalem and Sancutary (70 AD)Daniel 9:26b We know when the city and sanctuary were destroyed starting with the seige just before Passover in 70 AD to the destruction of the temple on Av 9, August 30, 70 AD by Titus’s army. It was some time after the destruction of the temple that the fighting went on, eventually leading to utter defeat and complete destruction of Jerusalem. Because of the phrasing that this was done by “the people of the prince that shall come,” there are several theories about the origins of the antichrist. RomeSince it was the army of the Roman general Titus that destroyed Jerusalem, it is taken that the prince that shall come will be from a revived Roman Empire. IslamThere is a theory I’ve heard that much of Titus’s army was comprised of local mercenaries and therefore the people of the prince were actually made up of the surrounding enemies of Israel, which would translate to the antichrist coming from one of these now primarily Islamic nations that continue to hate Israel. SpiritualThis is the thought that it was more about the people’s hatred of Israel that defines them and not so much their country of origin. Like the future antichrist that hates Israel, so to did those people of the same spirit that laid waste to Jerusalem and the temple. IsraelThis theory holds that it was through Israel’s rejection of the Messiah that their destruction and that of their temple was destroyed. Therefore in their unbelief they are the people that destroyed the city and sanctuary and the Roman armies that destroyed the city and temple were God’s instrument to fulfill their judgment. Luke 19:41-44 And now for something completely differentSo what is the answer? While I think there are other things to watch for that will better determine the identity of the man of sin, I lean toward a view that sees the nature of the 70th week standing apart by some unknown gap of time in agreement with a figure that likewise stands apart in this prophecy. To get clues about who he is, we must look to the whole council of God. 70th Week of DanielDaniel 9:27 This one verse is the cause of many varied interpretations, but I will leave those descriptions elsewhere and focus on my current understanding. “He”I’ve come to accept the idea that “he” doesn’t have to be defined by any previous mention in this prophecy and stands alone based on the context and purpose of this verse, depicting the completion of the 70 weeks. Let’s not forget the context of Daniel 9:24-27, which is speaking of 70 weeks appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. The first 69 weeks have been depicted in Daniel 9:25-26 leaving only one week of seven years left to account for. Daniel 9:27 stands on its own as that final week we would expect to complete the prophecy of 70 weeks. It’s a short, concise, and critical puzzle piece in the prophetic narrative that tells us when all the other prophecies of the end will be fulfilled within. “He” is implied because the Hebrew word וְהִגְבִּיר [H1396] is written in the third person masculine singular. Translated, “and he shall confirm” in English is the Hebrew word transliterated:“gâbar; a primitive root; to be strong; by implication, to prevail, act insolently:—exceed, confirm, be great, be mighty, prevail, put to more (strength), strengthen, be stronger, be valiant.” So the covenant will be strengthened and “he” is that someone who would bring about the strengthening. We’ll get into that in a moment. “He” is also implied in the middle of the verse because the Hebrew word יַשְׁבִּית [H7673] is likewise written in the third person masculine singular. Translated “he shall cause” in English is the Hebrew word transliterated: “shâbath; a primitive root; to repose, i.e. desist from exertion; used in many implied relations (causative, figurative or specific):—(cause to, let, make to) cease, celebrate, cause (make) to fail, keep (sabbath), suffer to be lacking, leave, put away (down), (make to) rest, rid, still, take away.” Similarly someone would need to cause the ceasing. In both cases of he used in this verse, the focus is on a subject taking two different actions. Daniel 9:27 is separated from the first 69 weeks in verse 25 by at minimum about a 43-year span from Christ’s ministry to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple depicted in verse 26. However, to anyone who examines Bible prophecy it is clear that many pivotal events that will only happen once in human history, and completely change the nature of human existence from that time forward, have not happened yet or everyone would know about it. And in fact, that Israel is the central character with Jerusalem and the temple means that since the temple was destroyed in 70 AD and Israel disbursed into the nations, it is impossible that the abomination of desolation has happened since because Israel only recently returned as a nation and there has not been a temple in Jerusalem since. The context of Daniel 9:27 is the confirmation of the covenant and its stopping halfway through. There is one behind these events as we know from other scripture depicting this very event and telling us who it is. In this one verse we have one we know as the man of sin who stops the daily and sets up the abomination of desolation that is also the one who strengthens the covenant with many. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 Is there a need to attempt to connect this future week back to almost 2,000 years ago if the week was clearly prophesied to stand on its own from the first 69 weeks? There is a view that attempts to take this view through poetic license, quite literally, but in my mind it does not hold up to scrutiny. Does the one who both confirms the covenant and ends the associated sacrifice and oblation in this set apart time of the end require some association with history if other prophecy connect him to the end? Chris White addresses the question of who “he” in Daniel 9:27 is in chapter 9 of his book Daniel (A Commentary), and chapter 8 of his book False Christ | Will the Antichrist Claim to Be the Jewish Messiah?. I would recommend checking them both out. One important and seemingly obvious point is that “the prince that shall come” is future from Daniel’s time, which actually points to Titus being the focus of Daniel 9:26. And he fits the bill because at the time of Jerusalem’s fall, Titus had not yet succeeded his father Vespasian and was indeed a future prince from Daniel’s perspective. Finally, Daniel 9:27 is not the first time the false messiah has been introduced out of the blue after a gap of thousands of years in prophecy. Just as verse 27 is separated by a gap of time, so is the “he” it is speaking of separated by several thousand years. In fact, the other example is one of the great foreshadows of the mystery of iniquity seen in both Antiochus IV who performed the historical abomination of desolation in 167 BC and the future man of sin yet to arrive on the scene. Daniel 11 introduces a third party part way through the chapter out of the blue that becomes the focus of the remainder of the chapter and covers a gap of time as well. And I believe both the gap and identity are tied together between Daniel 9 and 11. Daniel 11:1-35 includes a foretelling of events so accurate that most non-believers say it had to be written after the events it prophesied about. It covers the Medo-Persian time from Darius of Daniel’s time through Alexander the Great (336-323 BC), Ptolemy I Soter (323-285 BC), Ptolemy III Euergetes (246-221 BC), Battle for Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy V Epiphanes (203-181 BC), Fall of Antiochus III Magnus in 187 BC, Seleucus IV Philopator (187 - 175 BC), and Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175-164 BC), who is depicted in verses 31-35 as the same time as Daniel 8’s 2,300 days following the abomination of desolation caused by him. This is a series of wars between the king of the North and South and the effect on Israel stuck in the middle. Daniel 11:35-36 There is a gap explicit in the text from verse 35-36 as Daniel describes those of the Maccabean revolt resulting from the abomination of desolation caused by Antiochus IV. The corruption is fought against by the people that know their God yet there would be war, captivity, and spoil. Then a general statement is made about them of understanding falling to try, purge, and make them white until the time of the end that is appointed. Daniel 11:36-12:1 depicts a very different time and begins with a narrative shift and the introduction of a new king to the mix. Note that in the first 35 verses, the king of the North and South were fighting each other. After verse 35 this king that declares himself to be God at the time of the end is the focus of the ire of both the king of the North and South. Daniel 11:40 In Daniel 8:23 we saw that Antiochus IV came to power at the latter time of the Grecian Empire. It was Antiochus IV’s actions that triggered the Maccabeean Revolt and lost Greece control over Israel, leading to the Hasmonean Kingdom until Rome took control in 63 BC. So the transition from Daniel 11:35 to Daniel 11:36 distinguishes Antiochus IV from the future false messiah, but at the same time seems to directly connect them for us as an important foreshadow not to be ignored. So after we transition a gap of over 2,000 years from Antiochus IV in 167 BC to the end, a new king is on the scene and both the king of the South and North push at him. In this attacking of the new king, 3 are stated to be destroyed by him, Egypt, someplace to the North, and East. This may be important in light of Daniel 7 regarding the 3 of 10 horns plucked up by the little horn. And this king plants his tents at Jerusalem where he comes to his end. This is followed immediately by the unparalleled time of Jacob’s Trouble in Judea we know was initiated by the abomination of desolation when the man of sin declares himself to be God in the temple after his mortal wound is healed. So Daniel 9:27 is not the first time the false messiah has been introduced out of the blue after a gap of thousands of years in prophecy. Furthermore, the king that declares himself God in Daniel 11:36-12:1 is the same of Daniel 9:27 and John’s vision of Revelation 13 and 17 speaks to his death and resurrection tied to the great deception Paul also ties in with in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-11 So just as the 70th week is implied to be the completion of the prophecy, so is the he implied to be the one responsible at the end of the age to accomplish it. This isn’t determined from just looking at this one prophecy, we must take into account the whole council of God, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. Confirm the Covenant for One WeekHaving defined the he as the future beast, man of sin, antichrist, or false messiah, what is the subject of this strengthening at the beginning of verse 27? Translated as the covenant, the next Hebrew word to which the strenghtening is referring is בְּרִית, transliterated in English as: “ber-eeth; from H1262 (in the sense of cutting [like H1254]); a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh):—confederacy, (con-) feder(-ate), covenant, league.” There are several covenants in the Bible, so what does it mean for this future person to “confirm the covenant?” Recall previously when we went over the covenants and commandments, as well as the context of Daniel’s prayer and confession. The language was all about Israel failing to keep the commandments. They broke their part of the covenant while God kept His, Israel had turned from God. Daniel 9:11-14 The whole context of this chapter, from Daniel’s prayers to the resulting prophecy, is centered around Israel, Jerusalem, and the covenant that Israel broke resulting in her captivity and the promise of return. When Gabriel tells Daniel that “he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week,” why should we depart from the meaning of this based on the context of the rest of this chapter to associate it with the eternal covenant Yeshua made with those who believe in Him or some unknown future secular covenant that comes out of the blue? Recall also the political nature of the rise of the antichrist kingdom from Daniel 7, where we see four beasts and the fourth with ten horns has a little horn come up, and before whom three fall, which is the false messiah. And recall from Daniel 11, the wars of the antichrist. And recall from Revelation 17-18 the woman riding the beast that the ten horns hating her, that is Jerusalem. It would seem logical from a modern political perspective that since Israel, Jerusalem, and the temple are all central to events said to be fulfilled in the final week, that the ten horns and the little horn that comes up after it are related to the wars depicted as happening in that corner of the world. I don’t believe the strengthening, or returning to, the Mosaic Covenant has to be stated to last only seven years. The statement of seven years tied to it is simply connecting the final period to the event that starts it. What likewise seems logical from a modern political perspective is that Israel returning to the Mosaic Covenant, and all that entails, will trigger war in the Middle East. The First Seal? Revelation 6:2 I want to very quickly touch on this because I find it interesting in light of the start of the 70th week being tied to a return to the Mosaic Covenant, that we see the first seal broken leading to Yeshua’s return is a crown being given to the rider of the white horse. What is also interesting is that while we know he conquers and has a bow, there’s a possible double meaning here if we look at the Septuagint at how this word is used outside of a military context. Genesis 9:13 In case you were not aware, the Messiah born out of Israel, the line of David, is prophesied to be the King of Israel and rule the world. In the events we see prophesied by Daniel just over 600 years earlier in the confirmation of the Mosaic Covenant, we see in John’s vision in 95 AD hinted at in both the idea of a token of a covenant as well as the rider being crowned. And the second seal that is broken takes peace from the earth and men killing each other. In today’s climate, just dwell for a second on what would immediately follow Israel returning to their ancient roots and taking back control of the Temple Mount to build the tabernacle and/or temple there, led by a new king changing the times and laws to conform to the Mosaic Covenant under a monarchy in Israel. Add to that the prophecy that God in the latter days will unite the 10 tribes with the 2 in the land. The Third Seal? I think the rebuilding of the temple and start of the daily sacrifice might be tied to the third seal of Revelation 6:5-6. The rider has a pair of balancesG2218 in his hand. This word means to join [especially by “yoke”], coupling, servitude [a law or obligation]. Looking where else in the New Testament this same word is used would seem to verify this. Christ speaks of taking His yoke on us to find rest and that His yoke is easy and His burden is light. Acts 15:5-11 This same word in Greek speaks to the burden carried keeping the law of Moses. Peter speaks to this burden of the law of Moses that Yeshua replaced with His own easy yoke for them that believe. We are not under the Law, but rather grace through Christ. Exodus 29:1-2; 35-40 Also, A voice from the midst of the four beasts at the throne in heaven says: measure of wheat for a penny, three measures of barley for a penny; and hurt not the oil and the wine. In addition to the bullock and ram, we see the wheat oil and wine are part of the initiation of the consecration of the priests and to start the daily sacrifice. Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (“Maimonides” or Rambam [1138–1204 A.D.]) interpreted the scriptural requirements for the temple sacrifices. I found this link on the temple sacrifices interesting. Korbanot: The Biblical Temple Sacrifices Burning olive oil in the Temple’s Menorah was also part of a ritual offering to God. Exodus 27:20 In addition, meal offerings were brought to a Temple priest who burned a part of it on the Temple’s altar. Leviticus 2:1-9 We see oil and wine also included in the decree of Darius, reinforcing that of Cyrus the Great earlier, of the things which should be allowed for the Jews to make burnt offerings to God according to the appointment of the priests at Jerusalem around 518 BC. Ezra 6:8-10 Furthermore, we see in the destruction of Babylon, the lament of the merchants for her destruction, much of which os over the loss of buyers for their merchandise, including some of what is needed for the consecration of the priests and to start the daily sacrifice. Revelation 18:11-13 Bringing this all together, it would seem to be speaking to the yoke of the daily sacrifice and return to the following of the law of Moses, which can’t start until the temple is rebuilt. Ever since Christ’s first coming, the daily sacrifice in the temple is done away with. However Israel as a nation never accepted Yeshua, that is yet to come. In their mindset, the temple and sacrifices are required of them. This would fit with the 180 degree flip of Christ’s easy burden and the demands of a return to the old ways with the return of the temple in Jerusalem. It also speaks to the value of the ingredients for at least the flour-offerings to start the daily sacrifice. Midst of the Week: Abomination of DesolationWhat is the subject of this ceasing that the false messiah causes? Translated in English as
“sacrifice and oblation,” the next Hebrew words are: “zebach; from H2076;
properly, a slaughter, i.e. the flesh of an animal; by implication, a
sacrifice (the victim or the act):—offer(-ing), sacrifice.” Part of the reason I think that the confirming the covenant is tied to the daily sacrifice is also because it is in the midst of the week that he will stop the daily sacrifice and, through abominations, make desolate. I would recommend reading the Abomination of Desolation study, particularly the overspreading of abominations section. Matthew 24:15,21-22 It is Daniel 9:27 and Daniel 12:11 that Yeshua is pointing to when speaking of the abomination of desolation that starts the unparalleled time of Jacob’s trouble from which they are saved out of. Revelation 12:13-16 This unparalleled time is also in Jeremiah 30:4-7 and Daniel 12:1, recalling that Daniel 12:1 immediately follows the death of the false messiah in Daniel 11:45 after he conquers those that come against him in the Middle East. Wrath of GodThe final words of this verse state that the desolation will remain “until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.” I believe this is speaking of the wrath of God, which we see throughout the latter half of Revelation where we see the proclamation of the pouring out of God’s wrath on those with the mark as well as the seven bowls which are all “poured out,” completing the wrath of God in Revelation 16. Revelation 14:9-10 It is after Christ returns in glory and takes the kingdoms of the earth and builds the temple from Ezekiel 40-48 that the desolation of the temple will no longer be desolate and Yeshua will rule with a rod of iron over the whole earth for the duration of the Messianic Kingdom. Gap Between 69th and 70th weekAs mentioned earlier in this study, the weeks should not be split such that the period of time includes any gaps. However, Gabriel provides three different periods of weeks in the prophecy. The first two (7 and 62) are defined together as starting with the commandment to build Jerusalem and the walls unto the Messiah. The last week is defined alone representing a seven year period. If he had simply said 70 weeks from the command to build Jerusalem to the end, then there would be no case for the final week to be separate from the first 69, but he did not. Interestingly, there is a gap in time from the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple until the 70th week. If we consider this in context of this chapter and the focus on Israel and Jerusalem, this makes complete sense because Israel and Jerusalem were present from the restoration of Jerusalem to its destruction. Israel was disbursed to the nations, blinded, and only when Israel is back with the temple in Jerusalem will the final verse of prophecy be fulfilled up to the consummation of God’s wrath and the Messianic Kingdom. |
“Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21 In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. Ref. |